In which elections you voted and where, but not how you voted.

Of course. The ratings slide is likely due to a combination of factors, which makes headlines like “Anthem protests led poll of reasons viewers tuned out” all the more frustrating. Sure, it’s *technically* correct, but without knowing more about the survey, I’m not sure how much we can really glean from that data.

The gag is I’m not blaming Disney for anything it did or didn’t do. What struck me, talking to these actors, is how much pressure they felt, and how that pressure is built from years and years of feeling like they were getting scraps for roles. This is true of all actors, of course, but it’s a particular problems for…

I think this is an extremely fair point and one that I’ve seen making the rounds. It’s worth addressing.

Oh yes, the ‘92 Disney movie and the subsequent casting call for the live action remake that this entire post was about was VERY TRUE to this source material. Thank you!

I will never get tired of this joke

I feel you on the cinematic experience piece, and I was lucky enough to watch this film in a theater. But I’ve also lived in a small town in the south where a lot these prestigious films would never show. There’s already a ton of people losing out on the “authentic experience.”

Getting booed at Cannes was ridiculous, and rooted in this really outdated idea that making a film available on a streaming service undercuts its prestige/artistry. I’m glad someone in Raleigh, NC has as much access to this film as someone in LA or NY.

Medium answer: Steven Yeun’s onscreen characters should date me and me only.

It’s very well done, and you’ll def feel some sort of guilt/culpability, but it’s less about meat being bad than it is about how exploitive globalization/capitalism is. That being said, watch it because it’s got some really marvelous performances and is very well directed.

Short answer: It’s complicated. Happy to give a longer answer *if* you actually want it.

I mean, she shakes his hand literally three seconds after. Still, the look on the man’s face is worth savoring.

The voter data doesn’t show who they voted for, but it does show party affiliation (if any) and when you voted. Unfortunately, with all the analytics we have, it wouldn’t be difficult to make a pretty good guess about how someone voted, though.

CNN has a running list, which I expect will be updated: http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/03/politics/kris-kobach-letter-voter-fraud-commission-information/index.html

Because usually, when you’re on a panel, it’s because your an expert in the field, meaning you have either done these studies or have extensive knowledge of them.

Election interference (the extent of which we still don’t know) isn’t interchangeable with voter fraud, which is specifically about casting fraudulent votes. We know the Russians attempted to hack our election systems, but not much more than that at this point. And, to the panel’s credit (though this may just be a…

Man, what a dumb typo. I know you probably weren’t the only one to catch this, just the first one I came across. The post has been corrected—and thanks!

That’s a really good point!

Varies state to state, but it tracks whether you voted, and if you were registered to any specific party.

So I’ve seen this comment a few times on the post and wanted to do a bit of research. Jessica Huseman, whom we quote in this piece, wrote a really great article that parses the concerns people have about this particular request.