What Obama Should Say to Congress Tonight

For President Obama, questions before the State of the Union abound about what, exactly, a State of the Union is supposed to be: halftime locker-room speech or the loserโ€™s postgame press conference.ย  Suggested Reading New AI TikTok Trend Has Gorillas Posing as Black Women, and Folks are Pissed Steve Harvey’s Gorgeous $15 Million Once Owned…

For President Obama, questions before the State of the Union abound about what, exactly, a State of the Union is supposed to be: halftime locker-room speech or the loserโ€™s postgame press conference.ย 

Video will return here when scrolled back into view
Trump’s Tariffs Might Stick Around. What Should We Buy Now?
Trump’s Tariffs Might Stick Around. What Should We Buy Now?

What we do know is that the yearly exercise now known more as #SOTU (because itโ€™s easier like that) is a window into political wack-ness. It is as exciting and wasteful as the NFLโ€™s Pro Bowl. The amount of preparation into its preview, analysis, presupposition and immediate post-mortem is as nauseating as the spin on a rusty roundabout in the local park. Weโ€™ve made an almost red-carpet-outside-the-Grammys display out of a stale Constitutional obligation. That as many households watch itโ€”33.5 million viewers in 2013โ€”is no testament to its appeal. It is the result of television tube-feeding.

This year the speech is one of the many exhibition matches before a main electoral event. Pundits must gauge what it means for upcoming midterms. Democrats, obviously, want a fiery partisan speech showcasing a clothes line of executive actions, which the president wonโ€™t oblige. E.J. Dionne dreams of it โ€œinfluenc[ing] the next decade of American political life.โ€ Republicans, clearly, want partisan Obama so they can report back in to AM talk-radio shows and say, โ€œwe told you so.โ€ George Will is certain that Obama will โ€œconcentrate on inequality as a way of changing the subject from his inconvenient triumph, the Affordable Care Act.โ€

This really doesnโ€™t help anybody. SOTU promises made are rarely SOTU promises kept.

Each year we naively wish for an Al Pacino pregame speech, Morgan Freeman as leader of the free world rebuilding a nation, Michael Douglas as commander in chief losing it or Jeff Bridges as president blowing up Congressโ€™ spot in The Contender. And, sure, it would be nice to see a bit of the latter two from a president whom Slateโ€™s John Dickerson recently described as the โ€œInaction Hero.โ€

But thereโ€™s nothing wrong with dreaming. Thus, five things (among many) I wish the president would say or do in a moment of departure from the SOTU script, minus profane tirades or a town hall walkabout:

1. The unemployment rate is not the real unemployment rateโ€”and we should really do something about that. That nothing has been done about the 1.4 million and counting whoโ€™ve lost long-term unemployment benefits is about lawmakers believing that the unemployment situation is not all that bad. Itโ€™s only a little less than 7 percent right now. But, no, itโ€™s not: Thatโ€™s the official what-the-public-can-stomach rate. The real rate is a combination of folks who have either dropped out of the labor force altogether or who donโ€™t make nearly what they made pre-recession. That rate hovers at a quarter of the population. It would be nice for someone in power to clarify that so we can get on with the business of rectifying it.

2. Oh, and by the way, what the hell is going on with unemployment benefits, Congress? Not that we should expect much from a guy who only devoted less than a minute out of an hourlong press conference on the subject and then tiredly skipped out for a Hawaii vacation on the eve of unemployment-benefits expiration. But heโ€™s been trying to make up lost ground on that ever since Democrats and Republicans had a nice, happy holiday refresh with gifts and buffets that jobless folks couldnโ€™t afford. Still, it would be great if heโ€™d look up from prepared copy on that topic, maybe bust a tear (or two) and point to a group of homeless, unemployed families he invites into the House chamber to publicly shame Congress into action.ย 

3. Hey, colleges: Weโ€™re coming after you. There is just not enough pressure on the American higher-education system to rein in skyrocketing tuition rates. In fact, the more we talk about how unsustainably expensive a college education is, the worse is gets; it seems like every year, colleges raise the tuition just to spite understandably disgruntled poor, working and middle-class families. It's not like the president or Congress can actually dictate how much colleges charge, since itโ€™s all free market, baby. But the presidentโ€”who loves to tout how much he and Michelle struggled to pay off student loansโ€”can set a fresh, new aggressive tone that utterly humiliates college presidents into rethinking this shady and parasitic business model. It wouldnโ€™t hurt to also say something about how much Parent PLUS loans are crushing many families of color into making hard choices. And while heโ€™s at it, he could completely reinvent our perceptions of educationโ€”and how we pay for it.

4. President to Congress: โ€œI get it: You donโ€™t like me. I donโ€™t like you, either.โ€ But, you know what? The American peopleโ€”based on the latest polling numbersโ€”donโ€™t like either one of us. So, howโ€™s about we set all that aside and get some stuff done? And maybe hereโ€™s where the president does something unprecedented but very with-the-times and rolls out a PowerPoint of slides showing just how unproductive Congress has been these past several yearsโ€”and have a huddle about what they can do to turn it around.

5. You were bombing everyone, and look where that got us. The president finds himself harassed and heckled to no end over his bold move to actually do something no oneโ€™s done for more than 30 years: talk to the Iranians. This historic planโ€”weโ€™re still waiting on the final detailsโ€”and the simplicity with which it has been executed is short of remarkable, considering it didnโ€™t cost us a trillion and counting to get them to see it โ€œour way.โ€ And this is the cheaper route: Republicans canโ€™t whine about mounting national debt, yet want to bomb Middle Eastern folks into submission every time something goes wrong. That gets expensive after a while. So why not just frame the argument like that?

Charles D. Ellison is a veteran political strategist and frequent contributor to The Root. He is also Washington correspondent for the Philadelphia Tribune and chief political correspondent for Uptown magazine. You can reach him via Twitter.

Charles D. Ellison is a veteran political strategist and a contributing editor at The Root. He is also Washington correspondent for the Philadelphia Tribune, a frequent contributor to The Hill, the weekly Washington insider for WDAS-FM in Philadelphia and host of The Ellison Report, a weekly public-affairs magazine broadcast and podcast on WEAA 88.9 FM Baltimore. Follow him on Twitter.

Straight From The Root

Sign up for our free daily newsletter.