Slavery Exhibit Opens in Boston's Faneuil Hall, But Faneuil was an Enslaver

In Boston, advocacy groups are protesting the opening of an exhibit on slavery opening in Faneuil Hall, named after an enslaver.

We may earn a commission from links on this page.
Boston, MA - June 13: A man reads a panel in the “Slavery in Boston” exhibit at Faneuil Hall.
Boston, MA - June 13: A man reads a panel in the “Slavery in Boston” exhibit at Faneuil Hall.
Photo: Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe (Getty Images)

A new exhibit in Boston is garnering a ton of buzz, just not the good kind. On Friday, Boston’s Faneuil Hall opened an exhibit walking visitors through the history of slavery in the city. But, protestors who showed up last week to the opening say the decision to host the exhibit at Faneuil Hall is highly inappropriate.

That’s because Peter Faneuil, the historic site’s benefactor, was an enslaver who profited off the transatlantic slave trade and owned enslaved people. At the time of his death, the National Parks Service, which manages Faneuil Hall, says his records indicate he owned five enslaved people.

Advertisement

According to the exhibit’s website, it’s intended to walk visitors through the history of slavery in Boston and stories of enslaved African and Native American people. However, the decision to host the exhibit in a building named after a man who directly benefitted from the slave trade is rubbing some people the wrong way.

Advertisement

“It’s a total contradiction,” Reverend Kevin Peterson, a local civil rights leader, told CBS News. “We believe an exhibit such as this is appropriate, although we totally disagree with the fact that this exhibit around slavery or enslavement in Boston is being held at a place built and supported by a slave owner, Peter Faneuil.”

Advertisement

Not everyone agrees with Reverend Peterson’s concerns about the location of the slavery exhibit. Boston Mayor Michelle Wu defended the exhibit.

“This exhibit lays a crucial foundation for Boston to address our legacy of enslavement and support the healing process for our descendant communities,” Wu told the crowd assembled outside of Faneuil Hall, according to the Boston Globe. “Our administration is committed to confronting these histories.”

Advertisement

Criticism of the naming of Faneuil Hall isn’t new. In 2018, Peterson and others called for the hall to be renamed after Crispus Attucks, a Black and Native American man who is believed to be the first person killed in the Boston Massacre, which helped spark the American Revolution.

So far, the calls to change the name of the historic site haven’t moved the needle politically. But the large protest last week has certainly brought renewed attention to their concerns.