How Looks Matter in Politics

In presidential politics, does it help to look like Mitt Romney? Or, put another way, how much does Newt Gingrich's face hurt him? Slate is asking today. Suggested Reading Three Friends Were Headed To A Beyoncรฉ Concert, But One Dies On the Way. Guess What The Other Two Did Next? Our Fave Moments From A$AP…

In presidential politics, does it help to look like Mitt Romney? Or, put another way, how much does Newt Gingrich's face hurt him? Slate is asking today.

Video will return here when scrolled back into view
Trump’s Tariffs Might Stick Around. What Should We Buy Now?
Trump’s Tariffs Might Stick Around. What Should We Buy Now?

It turns out that physical appearance does matter in our assessment of politicians, but in ways that are more complicated than you might imagine. Perhaps most interesting (and most confusing when it comes to how much the Tea Party loved Herman Cain for a minute there), research suggests that we like politicians who physically remind us of ourselves.

Read a few excerpts here:

The competent face shape is masculine but approachable, with a square jaw, high cheekbones, and large eyes. When people say Romney just looks presidential, this is the image theyโ€™re summoning.

Todorov and other psychologists believe that otherwise expressionless faces can appear to show emotion based on how theyโ€™re formed โ€” the shape of the eyebrows can suggest anger, for instance, while a long distance between the eyes and the mouth can suggest sadness.

[S]ubjects most likely to rely on assessments of competence from a face alone are voters who donโ€™t know much about politics but watch a lot of television. In other words, theyโ€™re the folks most likely to see images of the candidates, even if theyโ€™re not taking in information about those candidates, and even if theyโ€™re switching the channel the instant presidential debates come on.

In a 2008 study, Stanford University actually morphed images of unfamiliar political candidates with pictures of their lab subjects, unbeknownst to their subjects. The effect was subtle, maintaining the basic look of the candidate, with just a hint of the subjectโ€™s face superimposed on it. As researchers expected, subjects preferred the image of the candidate morphed with their own picture. They didnโ€™t recognize their own faces, but on some level they recognized something familiar and similar to themselves. And in politics, it seems, familiarity breeds attraction.

Read more at Slate.

Like The Root on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.ย 

Straight From The Root

Sign up for our free daily newsletter.