Check It Out: Should the Bush Administration Take the Blame For 9/11?

Over on The Plum Line, Greg Sargent offers an interesting question Suggested Reading These Young Leaders Prove America’s ‘Wait Your Turn’ Political Era Is Dead This Wild Theory Says Home Alone Is Secretly A Story About The Love Of Christ Inside the Life of Matthew Knowles, The Man Who Was Behind The Success of Beyoncé…

Authors

Published

February 12, 2010

Over on The Plum Line, Greg Sargent offers an interesting question

These Young Leaders Prove America’s ‘Wait Your Turn’ Political Era Is Dead

This Wild Theory Says Home Alone Is Secretly A Story About The Love Of Christ

Inside the Life of Matthew Knowles, The Man Who Was Behind The Success of Beyoncé

Video will return here when scrolled back into view

Morris Chestnut Tells Us What Song Always Gets Him to the Dance Floor and What You Better Not Bring to a Party at His House

view video

Morris Chestnut Tells Us What Song Always Gets Him to the Dance Floor and What You Better Not Bring to a Party at His House

If, by your own lights, the Bush/Cheney administration’s record on national security should be judged by the fact that there were no massive terror attacks after 9/11, why shouldn’t it also be judged by the fact that 3,000 Americans were killed on your watch on 9/11? Should an administration’s national security record be judged by the number of Americans killed by terrorists on its watch? Yes, or No?

Seems to be a reasonable question. Thoughts?

Straight From