Check It Out: Should the Bush Administration Take the Blame For 9/11?

Over on The Plum Line, Greg Sargent offers an interesting question Suggested Reading Florida Venue Allegedly Keeps Bride’s $7,600 Wedding Deposit After Her Fiancé Dies, You Won’t Believe Their Response Georgia Man Goes on a Full-Blown Racist Tirade, Messes Around and Finds Out Zoe Saldaña Breaks Her Silence on Becoming the Highest-Grossing Actress of All…

Authors

Published

February 12, 2010

Over on The Plum Line, Greg Sargent offers an interesting question

Florida Venue Allegedly Keeps Bride’s $7,600 Wedding Deposit After Her Fiancé Dies, You Won’t Believe Their Response

Georgia Man Goes on a Full-Blown Racist Tirade, Messes Around and Finds Out

Zoe Saldaña Breaks Her Silence on Becoming the Highest-Grossing Actress of All Time…and Here’s How She Did It

Video will return here when scrolled back into view

Why Black-Owned Businesses Face Bigger Risks in a Global Trade War

view video

Why Black-Owned Businesses Face Bigger Risks in a Global Trade War

If, by your own lights, the Bush/Cheney administration’s record on national security should be judged by the fact that there were no massive terror attacks after 9/11, why shouldn’t it also be judged by the fact that 3,000 Americans were killed on your watch on 9/11? Should an administration’s national security record be judged by the number of Americans killed by terrorists on its watch? Yes, or No?

Seems to be a reasonable question. Thoughts?

Straight From