Check It Out: Should the Bush Administration Take the Blame For 9/11?

Over on The Plum Line, Greg Sargent offers an interesting question Suggested Reading Jill Scott’s Break From Music is Part of a Growing Trend of Black Women Pausing With Purpose Selma Was Not Just History, It Was a Warning Melyssa Ford Reveals the Unexpected Remedy That Helped Her Cope With Her Mother’s Death Video will…

Authors

Published

February 12, 2010

Over on The Plum Line, Greg Sargent offers an interesting question

Jill Scott’s Break From Music is Part of a Growing Trend of Black Women Pausing With Purpose

Selma Was Not Just History, It Was a Warning

Melyssa Ford Reveals the Unexpected Remedy That Helped Her Cope With Her Mother’s Death

Video will return here when scrolled back into view

Bakari Sellers Names the Most Effective Ways for Black Americans to Organize and Make a Change

view video

Bakari Sellers Names the Most Effective Ways for Black Americans to Organize and Make a Change

If, by your own lights, the Bush/Cheney administration’s record on national security should be judged by the fact that there were no massive terror attacks after 9/11, why shouldn’t it also be judged by the fact that 3,000 Americans were killed on your watch on 9/11? Should an administration’s national security record be judged by the number of Americans killed by terrorists on its watch? Yes, or No?

Seems to be a reasonable question. Thoughts?

Straight From