Aziz Ansari and Shitholes: Men Understand Consent Like White America Understands Racism

America is still in the throes of two ear-deafening shouting matches over private episodes that somehow became public knowledge. Although they were vastly different occurrences, they parallel each other in that the responses to both incidents were both loud and angry. Suggested Reading Black TikTok Has Theories on Whether Taraji’s Daughter in ‘Straw’ Was Dead…

America is still in the throes of two ear-deafening shouting matches over private episodes that somehow became public knowledge. Although they were vastly different occurrences, they parallel each other in that the responses to both incidents were both loud and angry.

Video will return here when scrolled back into view
Trump’s Tariffs Might Stick Around. What Should We Buy Now?
Trump’s Tariffs Might Stick Around. What Should We Buy Now?

Iโ€™m sure youโ€™re exhausted from hearing about the first: when our Dorito-dust-covered doofus president called Haiti and other countries โ€œshitholes.โ€

The blowback from both sides was swift and vociferous. Progressives and original-recipe Caucasians immediately branded Trump a racist. Conservatives, white people who want their โ€œcountry backโ€ and Martin Luther King Jr.โ€™s cousinโ€™s children on his mamaโ€™s side alt-right-splained it away by saying that Trump wasnโ€™t a racist because he shook a black personโ€™s hand one time in 1994. Trump himself even pushed back by proclaiming himself to be โ€œthe least racist personโ€ ever.

The second situation occurred on the website Babe, when a woman recounted a night with comedian Aziz Ansari that ended with her feeling โ€œviolated.โ€

The reaction to the piece has been as divided and cacophonous as the Trump shithole backlash. Some say Ansari is being castigated, when it seems like his only crime was misreading cues. Others say his actions were typical of the aggressive male assumption that he has consent unless a woman screams โ€œNoโ€ or chops him in the throat.

How do I feel about the Aziz Ansari incident? My opinion is that I should shut the fuck up.

I am not, nor ever will I be, a woman; therefore, it is not for me to determine whether a womanโ€™s sense that she was violated are legitimate or not. Every single person reading these words knows that there are men who donโ€™t understand consent or completely disregard it. Whatever my feelings are about the incidentโ€”I will never be the one riding home crying.

That is also how I wish white people felt about racism.

White peopleโ€™s misconceptions about racism mirror what a large number of men think about consent. There are white people everywhere who believe they โ€œcanโ€™t be racistโ€ because they havenโ€™t said the word โ€œniggerโ€ or burned a cross on anyoneโ€™s lawn, in the same way that some men feel they arenโ€™t guilty of sexual assault, harassment or misconduct because they didnโ€™t hold a womanโ€™s legs open or threaten to fire her if she didnโ€™t perform sexual favors. They believe they get to define their misdeeds and determine how the subject of their actions should respond.

Look, I get why there is so much conflict over the Babe story. It has nuances, and people are predisposed to picking sides. But the voices asking, โ€œWhy did she stay so long and subject herself to being violated?โ€ sound a lot like people who ask why Trayvon Martin didnโ€™t just talk to George Zimmerman, why Freddie Gray ran orโ€”more appropriatelyโ€” โ€œIf itโ€™s not a shithole, why did they come here?โ€

For instance, Tavis Smiley recently took a break from his rigorous schedule of Obama hating to admit to having consensual sexual relations with his employees, but declared that he wasnโ€™t a sexual harasser. He excused the prospect that a woman might feel powerless to resist the advances of the man who signs her paycheck by asking, โ€œHow else are you going to meet people?โ€

Tavisโ€™ explanation of โ€œBut my job is where the hos atโ€ is no different from the explanationย offered by conservatives like the sentient stalk of celery Tucker Carlson, whose counterargument is, โ€œBut some countries are shitholes.โ€ Ben Shapiro, editor-in-chief of the damn-near alt-right Daily Wire took a shit on his keyboard and submitted it to the National Review, asking, โ€œWhatโ€™s the Point of Labeling Trump a Racist?โ€ Shapiro writes:

Now, letโ€™s stipulate a few facts. First, Trump makes racist statements, from his attacks on a โ€œMexicanโ€ judge to his willingness to wink at the KKK to his quasi-defense of some of the โ€œgood peopleโ€ in the Charlottesville white-supremacist march. Second, Trumpโ€™s worldview is not openly racist โ€” heโ€™s not a representative of Richard Spencerโ€“type white supremacism, declaring black Americans lesser, for example. With that in mind, letโ€™s now ask a simple question:

Whatโ€™s the point of labeling Trump personally a racist?

Tucker, Shapiro and white people in general feel that for something to qualify as racist, it must be accompanied by malicious intent. Theyโ€™re the type of people who would shoot someone by accident and say, โ€œDonโ€™t you dare start bleeding because I didnโ€™t mean to do it. Plus, itโ€™s only a flesh wound!โ€ For them, if they donโ€™t walk around feeling hate in their hearts for black and brown people, their actsโ€”no matter how offensiveโ€”donโ€™t qualify as racist.

The H&M hoodie debacle is a perfect example of how this works. There are very few peopleโ€”black or whiteโ€”who believe that there was an executive-level meeting where the marketing department at H&M decided to fuck with Negroes by dressing up a black child in a โ€œCoolest Monkey in the Jungleโ€ shirt. They probably didnโ€™t think about black people at all. But the companyโ€™s lack of intent doesnโ€™t mean the resulting ad wasnโ€™t racist.

H&M doesnโ€™t get to decide how someone will react to its poor choice of clothing. Neither Donald Trump nor Tucker Carlson can regulate peopleโ€™s responses to the words coming out of Trumpโ€™s shithole. Aziz Ansari doesnโ€™t get to determine how a woman will react to him placing her hand on his dick or sticking his fingers in her mouth.

And none of this is to equate Aziz Ansari with Donald Trump. Neither man will lose his job, and only one of them will be seen as a pariah (hint: itโ€™s the orange one).

In a statement, Ansari acknowledged the incident, saying that the woman privately texted him after the incident and told him how she felt. Ansari said that he โ€œtook her words to heart and responded privately after taking the time to process what she had said.โ€

There is no way to tell if Ansari truly learned from the incident or changed his behavior. But at least he didnโ€™t explain it away by saying he was the least rapey person in the world, or say that his misconduct never took place. He admitted that it happened and then he shut the fuck up.

White people, I hope you were watching.

Straight From The Root

Sign up for our free daily newsletter.