For themselves, yes. I’d have to agree.

I am actually in favor if this, as long as we cut the Minuteman IIIs. If filling up our silos with Tridents means tossing the Minutemans, while making folks of keeping land-based ICBMs happy, I’m good with that. That is some solid middle ground.

I’d be all for that. In fact, I’d do it without Putin cutting any of his. As I wrote, more is not better. This is an expense and practicality issue, not one based on strategic necessity.

I made the correction. Thanks. Honest mistake.

Yeah, that was an honest mistake. Thank you for letting me know.

Hey, folks. I made the correction concerning the hydrogen bombs. I meant atomic. Thanks for letting me know.

Let me take a look...

let me take a look....

Well, I disagree there. Tensions need to ease. Many South Koreans want better relations with the north and THAAD is very controversial among many locals in the south. The problem is that we are looking at this from an America vs North Korea angle without appreciating that the main player who will suffer most is Seoul.…

Yep. That was a mistake on my part. I meant that. Corrected it. Thanks! 

Yep. That was a mistake on my part. I meant that. Corrected it. Thanks!

Naw. I am just citing my colleague.

I think both of your guesses are correct. I would bet he could see the insurgent because of the scope, but was very high up. You have to remember that the shooter and the spotter likely communicated closely with each other. I wonder how long the sniper team surveyed the area? I also wonder how far was his last shot.

It depends. If the speaker circuit calls, he may tell it all, you know. Kinda like some of the team who killed bin Laden.

From what I know, just U.S.-backed rebels. No threats on U.S. military directly, as far as I know.

What James Action explained to me, more specifically, is that the vehicle would have to turn at 10s or Gs, and it is doubtful any hypersonic can do that at the moment.

The DoD has been mum on this. I think it is because they are trying to perfect the technology first and then will decide if they will use it or not.

That should not have been there. Take another look to see if it reads better.

I guess this is all a matter of perspective. I don’t accept that argument, but, again, outlook.

True.